On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Kevin Grittner
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning
>> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its
>> max_size when it was created.
> I think this does it.
> If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the
> SSI patch. Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should
> I add it to the first 9.2 CF?
I don't think it's too late to commit something like this, but I'm not
clear on whether we want it. Is this checking for what should be a
can't-happen case, or are these soft limits that we expect to be
exceeded from time to time?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-25 19:23:14|
|Subject: Re: SSI bug?|
|Previous:||From: Vaibhav Kaushal||Date: 2011-03-25 19:12:21|
|Subject: Re: When and how many times does ExecSetParamPlan