Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSI bug?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "YAMAMOTO Takashi" <yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI bug?
Date: 2011-03-18 21:57:32
Message-ID: 4D838EFC020000250003BB12@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
 
> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning
> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its
> max_size when it was created.
 
I think this does it.
 
If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the
SSI patch.  Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should
I add it to the first 9.2 CF?
 
-Kevin


Attachment: htab-excess-warning.patch
Description: text/plain (2.6 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-03-18 22:41:35
Subject: pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address.
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-03-18 21:48:33
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group