Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Geery <andrew(dot)geery(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch
Date: 2010-10-15 13:22:46
Message-ID: AANLkTim5xztfu_Sqwx8a04bHyGwXbupw5mD9tcKjhzjK@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If these were the only problems with this patch, given that they
> required only trivial changes to initialise variables to NIL/false,
> perhaps it was premature to mark it as "returned with feedback".

Sure. Is someone available to do a detailed code review? Alvaro,
were you planning to pick this one up?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-15 13:24:31 Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-10-15 13:04:22 Re: security hook on table creation