Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Geery <andrew(dot)geery(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch
Date: 2010-10-15 14:27:20
Message-ID: 20065.1287152840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If these were the only problems with this patch, given that they
>> required only trivial changes to initialise variables to NIL/false,
>> perhaps it was premature to mark it as "returned with feedback".

> Sure. Is someone available to do a detailed code review? Alvaro,
> were you planning to pick this one up?

I had been planning to take this one once it got past initial review,
since it was mostly my wish to start with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-15 14:29:28 Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-15 14:23:27 Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.