Re: Git conversion status

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> For the archives' sake, below are the missing historical tags that
>>> match available tarballs, plus re-instantiation of the Release_2_0
>>> and Release_2_0_0 tags on non-manufactured commits.  I will push
>>> these up to the repo once it's open for pushing.
>
>> Go for it.
>
> Done.  The commit hook seems to be a bit verbose about that sort of
> thing ... is it worth trying to collapse the pgsql-committers messages
> into one email?

I was thinking the same thing, until I realized that pushing a whole
boatload of tags at the same time is probably going to be an extremely
rare event.

And I am STRONGLY of the opinion that we do NOT want to collapse
multiple *commits* into a single email, at least not unless we start
merging or something. The scripts EDB uses internally do this and it
is, at least IMO, just awful.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company