| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git conversion status |
| Date: | 2010-09-21 16:47:42 |
| Message-ID: | 5013.1285087662@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Done. The commit hook seems to be a bit verbose about that sort of
>> thing ... is it worth trying to collapse the pgsql-committers messages
>> into one email?
> I was thinking the same thing, until I realized that pushing a whole
> boatload of tags at the same time is probably going to be an extremely
> rare event.
True. We will be creating four or five tags at a time during
back-branch update cycles, but those might well arrive in separate
pushes anyway, depending on how Marc chooses to arrange his workflow.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-21 16:51:04 | Re: Git conversion status |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 16:45:20 | Re: Git conversion status |