From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: function(contants) evaluated for every row |
Date: | 2011-03-11 03:18:30 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik+K6HBc+V7cEypTUSDW0nsLW+a6XmQhtfb4ATS@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/11/25 pasman pasma?ski <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> >>I've seen this as well be a performance issue, in particular with partitioned tables.
>> >>Out of habit I now write functions that always cache the value of the function in
>> >>a variable and use the variable in the actual query to avoid this particular "gotcha".
>> >
>> > subquery may be used to cache constants:
>> >
>> > SELECT a_date
>> > ?FROM test
>> > ?WHERE a_date=(SELECT current_date);
>> >
>> >
>> > "Seq Scan on test1 ?(cost=0.01..10.76 rows=5 width=4)"
>> > " ?Filter: (a_date = $0)"
>> > " ?InitPlan 1 (returns $0)"
>> > " ? ?-> ?Result ?(cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0)"
>>
>> Interesting. So we pull a subquery out and treat it as an initplan,
>> but not a stable function? Hmm...
>
> I assume this is _not_ a TODO.
Dunno, not sure.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-11 03:20:15 | Re: Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-11 03:04:04 | Re: Default mode for shutdown |