Re: function(contants) evaluated for every row

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: function(contants) evaluated for every row
Date: 2011-03-11 00:32:51
Message-ID: 201103110032.p2B0WpZ04921@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/11/25 pasman pasma?ski <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >>I've seen this as well be a performance issue, in particular with partitioned tables.
> >>Out of habit I now write functions that always cache the value of the function in
> >>a variable and use the variable in the actual query to avoid this particular "gotcha".
> >
> > subquery may be used to cache constants:
> >
> > SELECT a_date
> > ?FROM test
> > ?WHERE a_date=(SELECT current_date);
> >
> >
> > "Seq Scan on test1 ?(cost=0.01..10.76 rows=5 width=4)"
> > " ?Filter: (a_date = $0)"
> > " ?InitPlan 1 (returns $0)"
> > " ? ?-> ?Result ?(cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0)"
>
> Interesting. So we pull a subquery out and treat it as an initplan,
> but not a stable function? Hmm...

I assume this is _not_ a TODO.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-11 01:25:52 Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-10 23:29:56 Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql