Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com>
Cc: ext Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field
Date: 2010-10-06 14:49:53
Message-ID: AANLkTi=sUwf7Hit=Zk0VxLdSyAktFExp4YUH2ErwkVmc@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
<ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thougth I have disabled compressing by setting alter command? Or is
> there another command?

yes. have you re-run the test? got any performance results?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Voras 2010-10-06 22:31:19 Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Previous Message Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich) 2010-10-06 14:22:26 Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field