| From: | "Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "ext Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "ext Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field |
| Date: | 2010-10-07 04:11:52 |
| Message-ID: | 9EB22E4572ECF74AAFEAE743C74D26B203A87D6C@DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
As written before I have rerun the test a) without compression and b)
with enlarged BLOCK_SIZE. Result was the same.
BR
Ingo
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Merlin Moncure [mailto:mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:50 PM
To: Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
Cc: ext Craig Ringer; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
<ingo(dot)sander(at)nsn(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thougth I have disabled compressing by setting alter command? Or is
> there another command?
yes. have you re-run the test? got any performance results?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-10-07 07:06:46 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 02:07:07 | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |