| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
| Date: | 2011-02-04 16:54:48 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=+1i4-7_9+isAkkO32mYQkoqdaiVj-4nmj7cfV@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:48 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert, I think that the core extension if pretty uncontroversial, modulo some minor issues. It's the upgrade process that's more controversial. I think the case can be made to accept even that part as Dim has written it, because it is pretty much the bare minimum that other solutions could be built on top of and improve upon. But if not, I think that's the only part the one might really look at as something to omit for 9.1.
Yeah, I understand. I believe Tom said he was going to look at the
basic functionality with an eye toward commit, and I hope to look at
it as well, either before or after it gets committed. Time
permitting, I'd then like to look at this, but I'm not sure I'm going
to be able to squeeze that into the time available, nor am I sure that
I'd get sufficient consensus to commit something even if I did.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-04 16:55:51 | Re: SSI performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-04 16:52:04 | Re: Add ENCODING option to COPY |