Re: Fwd: Postgres update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Postgres update
Date: 2000-07-29 15:49:06
Message-ID: 9609.964885746@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> However,BM_DIRTY+BM_IO_ERROR buffers seems to have to be
> excluded from freelist of buffers. Then IO errors would be limited
> to backends which really need to update the buffers.

Good idea, that will prevent unrelated transactions from getting in
trouble by trying to flush and re-use the buffer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-29 15:59:26 Re: bufmgr and smgr don't talk to each other, apparently
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-29 15:43:13 Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source