Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
Date: 2008-03-22 14:41:05
Message-ID: 937d27e10803220741k168e5873oca11029e852667a0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I can, but it can be changed so that I cannot in seconds. We *need*
> > agreement otherwise this could get extremely messy. Has anyone from
> > -core other than me actually asked yet?
>
> No, but it seems like a waste of time to even try.
>
> One idea is to set up the duplicate infrastructure with a domain in
> place, and if the domain change gets blocked, we just switch to the new
> domain name.

I don't even want to think about the ramifications of doing that.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-22 14:48:09 Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-22 14:37:01 Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based