Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
Date: 2008-03-22 16:01:41
Message-ID: 20080322090141.3584120a@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:41:05 +0000
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> > No, but it seems like a waste of time to even try.
> >
> > One idea is to set up the duplicate infrastructure with a domain in
> > place, and if the domain change gets blocked, we just switch to
> > the new domain name.
>
> I don't even want to think about the ramifications of doing that.

It would be ugly.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2008-03-22 16:07:13 postgresql.org mail infrastructure
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-22 16:01:20 Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based