| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mark Mielke" <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql Materialized views |
| Date: | 2008-01-12 18:29:05 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10801121029n10fd242gc5a7089e8905b0dc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/01/2008, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> wrote:
> Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> > In my past development projects, I always used the concept of
> > Materialized VIEW to speed-up SELECTs over INSERTs
>
> Unless you are going to *pay* for it - you do realize that the best way
> to get it implemented, would be to open up the source code, and give it
> a try yourself?
In fairness to Jean-Michel, he has spent hundreds of hours in the past
doing just that and far more for the pgAdmin users in the community -
I'm sure we can excuse him for asking for what many do think would be
a useful feature in the hopes that someone listening might just decide
to pick it up.
In the meantime though - have you tried rolling your own materialised
views with some triggers Jean-Michel? I have good results doing that
in the past.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-01-12 18:46:16 | Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2008-01-12 17:51:56 | Re: Some ideas about Vacuum |