Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?

From: Antoine <melser(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?
Date: 2006-06-14 19:04:10
Message-ID: 92d3a4950606141204t3587aa85p8302890ac50cdaa6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> You can get free "draft" versions that are close-enough-to-final to be
> perfectly usable. See our developers' FAQ for some links. I like the
> drafts partly because they're plain ASCII, and so far easier to search
> than PDFs ...

Great to know - thanks!
Cheers
Antoine

--
This is where I should put some witty comment.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jody brownell 2006-06-14 19:18:37 Postgres consuming way too much memory???
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-06-14 18:43:41 Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?