Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Antoine <melser(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?
Date: 2006-06-14 14:20:41
Message-ID: 23625.1150294841@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Antoine <melser(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ps. shame the standard isn't "freely" consultable to save you guys
> silly OT questions!

You can get free "draft" versions that are close-enough-to-final to be
perfectly usable. See our developers' FAQ for some links. I like the
drafts partly because they're plain ASCII, and so far easier to search
than PDFs ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Broersma Jr 2006-06-14 14:23:44 Re: how to partition disks
Previous Message Dave Dutcher 2006-06-14 13:58:48 Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax?