Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy
Date: 2001-01-19 17:45:49
Message-ID: 9203.979926349@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, did we ever test this? I think we did and found that it was the
> same or worse, right?

I tried it and didn't see any noticeable improvement on the particular
test case I was using, so I got discouraged and didn't pursue the idea
further. I'd like to come back to it someday, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-19 17:46:43 RPMset 7.1beta3-2 partially broken.
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-01-19 17:37:02 Re: child table doesn't inherit PRIMARY KEY?