Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy
Date: 2001-01-19 17:48:46
Message-ID: 200101191748.MAA29126@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I will throw the email into the optimizer TODO.detail file.

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom, did we ever test this? I think we did and found that it was the
> > same or worse, right?
>
> I tried it and didn't see any noticeable improvement on the particular
> test case I was using, so I got discouraged and didn't pursue the idea
> further. I'd like to come back to it someday, though.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-19 17:52:11 Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacement policy
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-19 17:46:43 RPMset 7.1beta3-2 partially broken.