Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> If one is going to revoke the last ACL_CONNECT, a warning is going to
>> issued then that part of the REVOKE gets canceled.
> Humm, no, the WARNING is issued but the REVOKE is executed anyway.
Why are we debating this? It won't get accepted anyway, because the
whole thing is silly. Show me one other object type that we issue
such warnings for, or anyone else who has even suggested that we should.
regards, tom lane