Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT

From: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT
Date: 2006-04-25 08:15:55
Message-ID: 1145952955.31215.18.camel@voyager.truesoftware.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Why are we debating this? It won't get accepted anyway, because the
> whole thing is silly. Show me one other object type that we issue
> such warnings for, or anyone else who has even suggested that we should.

So, I am very much confused. What do I do now. Do you mean the whole
thing won't get accepted and I should stop developing the TODO item? or
just strip the warning part.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD 2006-04-25 08:25:08 Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-04-25 08:12:35 Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT