Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-18 19:04:43
Message-ID: 9110.995483083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> ... these two issues of ID wrap need to be addressed -- my gut feel is
> that the reports of OID/XID wrap are going to skyrocket within 6 months as
> bigger and bigger installations try out PostgreSQL/RHDB

Yes, my thoughts exactly. We're trying to play in the big leagues now.
I don't believe we can put these problems off any longer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Myers 2001-07-18 19:09:04 dependent dependants
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-18 18:59:06 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)