| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) |
| Date: | 2001-07-18 19:32:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200107181932.f6IJW6V27531@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > ... these two issues of ID wrap need to be addressed -- my gut feel is
> > that the reports of OID/XID wrap are going to skyrocket within 6 months as
> > bigger and bigger installations try out PostgreSQL/RHDB
>
> Yes, my thoughts exactly. We're trying to play in the big leagues now.
> I don't believe we can put these problems off any longer.
Is the idea to make oid's optional, with them disabled by default on
user tables?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-07-18 20:00:29 | Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-18 19:30:29 | Re: psql -l |