RE: Berkeley DB license

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael A(dot) Olson" <mao(at)sleepycat(dot)com>
Cc: chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Berkeley DB license
Date: 2000-05-17 17:32:43
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018BE6@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 1. MVCC semantics. If we can't keep MVCC then the deal's dead in the
> water, no question. Vadim's by far the best man to look at
> this issue; Vadim, do you have time to think about it soon?

I'll comment just after weekends...
But Mike Mascari raised up very interest issue about am I *allowed* to
view the code at all. If we'll decide to continue with our own
smgr+WAL I'll not be able to free my mind from what I've seen
in SDB code. So..?
Ok, I'll read API documentation first...

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mikeo 2000-05-17 17:41:24 line type
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-17 17:31:00 Re: type conversion discussion