From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New CF app deployment |
Date: | 2015-01-25 11:22:32 |
Message-ID: | 87k30bglf3.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
Peter> The mailing list integration is good, but seems like it could
Peter> often be overkill. I just want to "tag" an existing message for
Peter> readability here, like with the old commitfest app. I like to
Peter> make things easy to find from the CF app, particularly for
Peter> larger, more complicated things.
There's a fairly serious readability problem when someone has posted a
patch as a subthread of some more general discussion. For example, look
at the "adaptive ndistinct estimator" patch: it's not obvious which
attachment is the actual patch, and whether the latest email has
anything to do with the patch is entirely arbitrary.
Either there needs to be an ironclad "always start a new thread for a
new patch" rule, or the app needs to be smarter about threading.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-01-25 19:02:47 | longjmp clobber warnings are utterly broken in modern gcc |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-01-25 11:15:12 | Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort |