| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others |
| Date: | 2008-06-30 15:12:32 |
| Message-ID: | 87d4lz9ctb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Please explain your reasoning here. The project has taken nasty hits
> on its infrastructure already (pgfoundry) because the author of the
> software had a go-it-alone, I-know-best attitude that sooner than
> later forced us to fork. As a direct consequence, pgfoundry now needs
> a redo that will take a pgfoundry administrator many of work in their
> "ample spare time."
>
> Let's not cause more pinch points here.
Well sure, but I'm not sure the software used to distribute the program makes
the main difference there. I don't know much about the two programs, what
makes you think one is more of a go-it-alone style of development than the
other?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-06-30 15:30:19 | Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-30 14:55:47 | Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert |