Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert
Date: 2008-06-30 14:55:47
Message-ID: 27256.1214837747@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> So there is no attempt to migrate the vxid lock queue onto the xid lock
> queue because it doesn't matter now/yet. That seems fragile, but as long
> as we know about it we're OK.

It never will matter, because vxids and xids are unrelated.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-06-30 15:12:32
Subject: Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2008-06-30 14:29:24
Subject: Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group