Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
> controlled in separate two parameters?
No, sorry about confusion. One GUC is better. What I'm wondering is
why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support