Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Date: 2011-04-05 08:33:02
Message-ID: 4D9AD3BE.8040203@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05.04.2011 11:31, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
>> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
>> controlled in separate two parameters?
>
> No, sorry about confusion. One GUC is better. What I'm wondering is
> why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
> supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.

What do you mean by "supported behaviors"?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masanori Yamazaki 2011-04-05 08:42:56 GSoC Proposal - Caching query results in pgpool-II
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-04-05 08:31:10 Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.