Re: OPAQUE and 7.2-7.3 upgrade

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OPAQUE and 7.2-7.3 upgrade
Date: 2002-09-12 17:37:46
Message-ID: 8415.1031852266@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 10:31 AM 12/09/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does anyone see a cleaner answer than re-allowing OPAQUE for PL
>> handlers?

> What about extending the function manager macros to know about return types
> (at least for builtin types)?

Er ... what has that got to do with this? And what sort of extension
do you think we need? We already have the RETURN_foo() macros.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-12 17:51:31 Re: OPAQUE and 7.2-7.3 upgrade
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2002-09-12 17:29:20 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?