| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OPAQUE and 7.2-7.3 upgrade |
| Date: | 2002-09-12 14:56:48 |
| Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.0.20020913005554.02822bb8@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:31 AM 12/09/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Does anyone see a cleaner answer than re-allowing OPAQUE for PL
>handlers?
What about extending the function manager macros to know about return types
(at least for builtin types)?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-09-12 14:58:26 | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-12 14:54:44 | Re: OPAQUE and 7.2-7.3 upgrade |