From: | Laurent ROCHE <laurent_roche(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Sufficool, Stanley" <ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgAdmin III support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re : Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option |
Date: | 2009-01-12 14:35:42 |
Message-ID: | 78913.24114.qm@web34402.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Still in my case (I assume other people too) pl/pgsql functions would not help as I work on a remote server from a workstation: I want the files on my workstation and not on a remote server that I only access for the database !
Cheers,
L(at)u
The Computing Froggy
________________________________
De : Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
À : "Sufficool, Stanley" <ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov>
Cc : pgAdmin III support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Envoyé le : Lundi, 12 Janvier 2009, 9h59mn 06s
Objet : Re: [pgadmin-support] Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Sufficool, Stanley
<ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov> wrote:
>
> Can we get the database to handle this instead / also?
>
> If pg_dump / pg_restore were libs, could this be called via pl/pgsql
> functions instead?
If it were done in the right way, yes. The topic comes up on
pgsql-hackers every now and again, but I'm not aware that anyone has
worked on it.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-12 14:40:42 | Re: Re : Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option |
Previous Message | Quan Zongliang | 2009-01-12 14:23:33 | Re: Can't edit rows |