Re: msvc failure in largeobject regression test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: msvc failure in largeobject regression test
Date: 2007-03-10 05:32:19
Message-ID: 7823.1173504739@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I wonder if this is a line-end issue? Assuming you are working from CVS,
> does your client turn \n into \r\n ?

> I have just run into this today while trying to get buildfarm working
> for MSVC. After some consideration I think an alternative result file is
> the best solution. I have looked at switches for cnsnt, but they are
> likely to be fragile at best.

Are you proposing an alternate result file that has a different linefeed
style? I would really really rather that we not go there, because it
will be impossibly fragile to maintain. Or are you willing to accept
that the Windows builds will break every time someone changes that
regression test, until someone else with a Windows machine fixes the
result file?

I would find it preferable to make pg_regress compensate for this
issue somehow ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-10 05:56:07 Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2)
Previous Message NikhilS 2007-03-10 05:13:12 Re: Auto creation of Partitions