Re: Why Not MySQL?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why Not MySQL?
Date: 2000-05-03 15:21:47
Message-ID: 7648.957367307@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com> writes:
>> First, have you been having the same problems with PG 7.0? I recall that
>> you had it up on a test system but nothing more.

> No, I was afraid to run 7.0 beta on the production server. I do have it on
> my development server however and haven't had any problems with it (of
> course the devel server is only used by me, the production server is used by
> about 600 people)...

FWIW, we've fixed a huge number of bugs since 6.5.*. Even the beta
versions of 7.0 are more stable than any prior release IMHO (and we've
seen no beta test reports that would contradict that). I'd really like
to see you try 7.0 before walking away...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitch Vincent 2000-05-03 15:25:42 Re: Why Not MySQL?
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-05-03 15:17:56 Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !