Re: Why Not MySQL?

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why Not MySQL?
Date: 2000-05-03 15:25:42
Message-ID: 022201bfb513$d81abbe0$4100000a@venux.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oh, I'm downloading it to the development server as I type this..

I didn't know RC3 (virtually the release) was out. I plan on starting to use
it today if everything works on the development server.

- Mitch

----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why Not MySQL?

> "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com> writes:
> >> First, have you been having the same problems with PG 7.0? I recall
that
> >> you had it up on a test system but nothing more.
>
> > No, I was afraid to run 7.0 beta on the production server. I do have it
on
> > my development server however and haven't had any problems with it (of
> > course the devel server is only used by me, the production server is
used by
> > about 600 people)...
>
> FWIW, we've fixed a huge number of bugs since 6.5.*. Even the beta
> versions of 7.0 are more stable than any prior release IMHO (and we've
> seen no beta test reports that would contradict that). I'd really like
> to see you try 7.0 before walking away...
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-03 15:28:51 Re: Why Not MySQL?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-03 15:21:47 Re: Why Not MySQL?