Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
Date: 2007-02-21 05:49:11
Message-ID: 7164.1172036951@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>> It's not so big addition to the gram.y, see a list of commands
>> http://mira.sai.msu.su/~megera/pgsql/ftsdoc/sql-commands.html.

> I looked at the diff file and the major change in gram.y is the creation
> of a new object type FULLTEXT,

You mean four different object types. I'm not totally clear on bison's
scaling behavior relative to the number of productions, but I think
there's no question that this patch will impose a measurable distributed
penalty on every single query issued to Postgres by any application,
whether it's heard of tsearch or not. The percentage overhead would
be a lot lower if the patch were introducing a similar number of entries
into pg_proc.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2007-02-21 09:17:37 Re: New feature request: FlashBack Query
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-02-21 03:59:37 Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-02-21 11:04:47 Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-02-21 03:59:37 Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements