| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Alex Pilosov" <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_depend |
| Date: | 2001-07-18 17:29:18 |
| Message-ID: | 6176.995477358@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> BTW, name alone is not a good enough referent for functions... you'd
>> have to store the argument types too.
> ??? Isn't an entry
> pg_proc_relid
> the oid of the function
> pg_type_relid
> the oid of an argument type
> the name of the argument type
> made ?
That's the entry that was dropped, no? Given a pg_depend row pointing
at a function named foo, with an OID that no longer exists, how will you
tell which of the (possibly many) functions named foo is wanted?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-07-18 17:29:19 | Re: MySQL Gemini code |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-18 17:25:41 | Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em |