Re: Mid cycle release?

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mid cycle release?
Date: 2006-09-15 01:13:08
Message-ID: 60fyeund97.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
> Leaving autovacuum on will cement the idea that it *should* be on and
> IMHO it shouldn't without specific and careful planning.

For the "completely naive user," it seems to me that it *should* be
on, as that will diminish the number of questions that we need to
answer with "Have you ever run VACUUM ANALYZE?"
--
output = reverse("gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lsf.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #60. "My five-year-old child advisor will
also be asked to decipher any code I am thinking of using. If he
breaks the code in under 30 seconds, it will not be used. Note: this
also applies to passwords." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Golden Liu 2006-09-15 01:16:33 Unique index: update error
Previous Message markw 2006-09-15 00:32:24 Re: Lock partitions