| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: refcnt leak ? |
| Date: | 2000-11-07 15:15:54 |
| Message-ID: | 5974.973610154@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> While examining recursive use of catalog cache,I found
> a refcnt leak of relations.
> After further investigation,I found that the following seems
> to be the cause.
> [ in EndAppend() in nodeAppend.c ]
appendstate-> as_result_relation_info_list = NIL;
That doesn't look like a problem to me --- the result relations *have*
been closed, just above this line.
> BTW,doesn't EndAppend() neglect to call ExecCloseIndices()
> for RelationInfos of appendstate->as_result_relation_info_list ?
Comparing nodeAppend to EndPlan(), I think you are right --- each
resultinfo should have ExecCloseIndices applied too, in the loop just
above the line you quote. This did not use to be a problem because
Append plans were readonly, but now that we have UPDATE/DELETE on
inheritance hierarchies, there's a missing step here. Was your test
query of that kind?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-11-07 15:29:11 | AW: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-07 15:09:11 | Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... |