| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
| Date: | 2016-04-08 18:57:00 |
| Message-ID: | 5707FEFC.1040803@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/08/2016 02:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Jesper Pedersen
> <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 04/07/2016 02:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> So recovery is conflicting here. My guess is that this patch is
>>> missing some lock cleanup.
>>>
>>> With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
>>> not even get replayed.
>>>
>>
>> Should we create an entry for the open item list [0] for this, due to the
>> replication lag [1] ?
>>
>> CommitFest entry [2]
>> Original commit [3]
>>
>> Cc'ed RMT.
>
> If there is something you think needs to be fixed that is a new issue
> in 9.6, then yes you should. I don't quite understand what thing is
> from reading this, so please make sure to describe it clearly.
>
Michael, you seem to have the necessary permission for this. Could you
add an entry ?
Best regards,
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stas Kelvich | 2016-04-08 18:57:59 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-04-08 18:55:24 | Re: multivariate statistics v14 |