Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension

From: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension
Date: 2016-03-15 14:46:55
Message-ID: 56E8205F.6020305@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15.03.2016 17:28, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/14/16 12:27 PM, Artur Zakirov wrote:
>> On 14.03.2016 18:48, David Steele wrote:
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> On 2/25/16 5:00 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>>
>>>> But, It doesn't sound like I am going to win that debate. Given that,
>>>> I don't think we need a different name for the function. I'm fine with
>>>> explaining the word-boundary subtlety in the documentation, and
>>>> keeping the function name itself simple.
>>>
>>> It's not clear to me if you are requesting more documentation here or
>>> stating that you are happy with it as-is. Care to elaborate?
>>>
>>> Other than that I think this patch looks to be ready for committer. Any
>>> objections?
>>>
>>
>> There was some comments about the word-boundary subtlety. But I think it
>> was not enough.
>>
>> I rephrased the explanation of word_similarity() and %>. It is better now.
>>
>> But if it is not correct I can change the explanation.
>
> Since to only change in the latest patch is to documentation I have
> marked this "ready for committer".
>

Thank you!

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-15 14:47:49 Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Previous Message Valery Popov 2016-03-15 14:46:33 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol