Re: object description for FDW user mappings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Date: 2015-03-06 00:30:30
Message-ID: 5695.1425601830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
>> word here. "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".

> One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)

Hm, but then you'd have "user mapping for foo for server bar", which
doesn't read so nicely either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-03-06 00:41:24 Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-03-06 00:28:33 Rethinking pg_dump's function sorting code