Re: object description for FDW user mappings

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Date: 2015-03-06 00:18:36
Message-ID: 54F8F25C.4040900@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> appendStringInfo(&buffer, _("user mapping for %s in server %s"), usename,
>> srv->servername);
>
> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
> word here. "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".
>

One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-03-06 00:22:13 Re: object description for FDW user mappings
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-03-05 23:44:56 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0