Re: [pgsql-www] What do we need for new PUGs?

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] What do we need for new PUGs?
Date: 2015-03-16 18:33:59
Message-ID: 55072217.9080303@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Josh,

On 03/16/2015 06:16 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> If they had been available, would you have preferred to have the lists
> hosted on postgresql.org-controlled infrastructure?

I think so, yes. That's why we asked. The following discussion made us
think about our requirements and I'm happy with the outcome, I should add.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-03-18 14:06:47 Re: GSoC 2015 - mentors, students and admins.
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-03-16 17:16:55 Re: [pgsql-www] What do we need for new PUGs?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-03-17 02:20:48 Re: [DOCS] dtrace pgfoundry link
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-03-16 17:16:55 Re: [pgsql-www] What do we need for new PUGs?