Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?
Date: 2015-03-04 07:01:48
Message-ID: 54F6ADDC.8030201@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/3/15 8:04 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>> >Note: The OID alias types don't sctrictly comply the transaction
>> > isolation rules so do not use them where exact transaction
>> > isolation on the values of these types has a
>> > significance. Likewise, since they look as simple constants to
>> > planner so you might get slower plans than the queries joining
>> > the system tables correnspond to the OID types.

Might I suggest:

Note: The OID alias types do not completely follow transaction isolation
rules. The planner also treats them as simple constants, which may
result in sub-optimal planning.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2015-03-04 07:31:21 Re: Add LINE: hint when schemaname.typename is a non-existent schema
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-03-04 06:34:48 Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission