Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...
Date: 2002-12-10 03:10:58
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20021210140918.04428c58@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 09:10 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>Even this little bit would be a step in the right direction.

What I would find really useful is a 'VACUUM...WITH HISORY' which wrote the
underlying details of VACUUM VERBOSE to a 'pg_vacuum_history' table.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2002-12-10 03:20:29 Re: nested transactions
Previous Message Robert Treat 2002-12-10 02:10:38 Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...