Re: New email address

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New email address
Date: 2015-11-24 19:20:22
Message-ID: 4ceb46ce1c1f3f0ff52b6f2eef2de292@thebighonker.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-11-24 13:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> change the From header (and add a Reply-To, so replies still work).
>
>> If this were done, would the other steps (not changing the subject
>> or body of the email) be necessary?
>
> See my followup: I think it's probably true that we could skip those
> changes. But Rudy commented that there's a lot of underdocumented
> subtlety here. There might be reasons I'm missing why we'd need to
> stop doing those things. It doesn't seem like DMARC as such would
> force that, but perhaps those things trigger some popular antispam
> heuristics.
>
> regards, tom lane
Any Header or Body changes will invalidate most, if not all, DKIM
signatures. Since DKIM is used as part
of DMARC, it's a problem.

Not sure what MajorDomo2 will allow you to do.

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-24 19:29:53 Re: Revisiting pg_stat_statements and IN() (Was: Re: pg_stat_statements fingerprinting logic and ArrayExpr)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-24 19:11:11 Re: New email address