| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New email address |
| Date: | 2015-11-24 19:11:11 |
| Message-ID: | 26685.1448392271@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> change the From header (and add a Reply-To, so replies still work).
> If this were done, would the other steps (not changing the subject
> or body of the email) be necessary?
See my followup: I think it's probably true that we could skip those
changes. But Rudy commented that there's a lot of underdocumented
subtlety here. There might be reasons I'm missing why we'd need to
stop doing those things. It doesn't seem like DMARC as such would
force that, but perhaps those things trigger some popular antispam
heuristics.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2015-11-24 19:20:22 | Re: New email address |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-11-24 18:58:44 | Re: New email address |