| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin? |
| Date: | 2012-04-12 16:28:44 |
| Message-ID: | 4F8702BC.10906@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12.04.2012 16:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't
>>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now.
>
>> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose
>> the attached.
>
> Shouldn't the new targets be marked .PHONY?
Umm ... <me reads up on what .PHONY means> ... yes, yes they should.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-04-12 17:03:21 | Re: [HACKERS] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-04-12 16:05:44 | Re: Last gasp |