Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Date: 2012-04-12 13:59:43
Message-ID: 1481.1334239183@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't
>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now.

> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose
> the attached.

Shouldn't the new targets be marked .PHONY?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-04-12 14:03:22 Re: docs: WITH queries and VALUES
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-04-12 12:45:02 Re: Last gasp